| |||||||||||||||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words On Fri, 20 May 2005 23:11:28 +0200, T.J. <no1@home.invalid> wrote: > Just noticed that Google is no longer omitting common words > from the search phrase. > Anyone noticed how long this has been happening? 4,810,000,000 hits for "and". ROTFL Best, Borek -- http://www.chembuddy.com - chemical calculators for labs and education BATE - Base Acid Titration and Equilibria program for pH calculations CASC - Concentration and Solution Calculator program for solution preparation and concentration conversions |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words "Borek" <borek@parts.bpp.to.com.remove.pl> skrev i meddelandet news > On Fri, 20 May 2005 23:11:28 +0200, T.J. <no1@home.invalid> wrote: > > > Just noticed that Google is no longer omitting common words > > from the search phrase. > > Anyone noticed how long this has been happening? > > 4,810,000,000 hits for "and". ROTFL > > Best, > Borek http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=AND&meta= I did not get the same number. Why? -- Luigi ( un italiano che vive in Svezia) https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/en...-lodgings.html |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words On Fri, 20 May 2005 23:59:15 +0200, Luigi Donatello Asero <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote: >> 4,810,000,000 hits for "and". ROTFL > > http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=AND&meta= > > I did not get the same number. Why? Every datacenter gives slightly different results. Go to mcdar site (I have posted a link in a scrrogle thread) and check by yourself how are your pages positioned for your keywords - if positions are different, why number of hits can't be? Best, Borek -- http://www.chembuddy.com - chemical calculators for labs and education BATE - Base Acid Titration and Equilibria program for pH calculations CASC - Concentration and Solution Calculator program for solution preparation and concentration conversions |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words Em Fri, 20 May 2005 18:11:28 -0300, T.J. <no1@home.invalid> escreveu: > Anyone noticed how long this has been happening? Months. -- Thanks, Justin. http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words > 4,810,000,000 hits for "and". ROTFL http://www.google.com/search?q=a 3.7 trillion results -- Thanks, Justin. http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer ommiting common words T.J. wrote: > Just noticed that Google is no longer omitting common words > from the search phrase. > Anyone noticed how long this has been happening? Am I right to think that entire phrases (e.g. questions) should be possibly to get a match for? So far it has not worked well and it still doesn't. Is there still stemming? Will I get similar results for 'man walking slowly' and 'men walks slow'? Roy -- Roy S. Schestowitz http://Schestowitz.com |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words T.J. wrote: > Just noticed that Google is no longer omitting common words > from the search phrase. > Anyone noticed how long this has been happening? Am I right to think that entire phrases (e.g. questions) should be possibly to get a match for? So far it has not worked well and it still doesn't. Is there still stemming? Will I get similar results for 'man walking slowly' and 'men walks slow'? Roy -- Roy S. Schestowitz http://Schestowitz.com |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words Spezial characters like % and ? does not work. This is bad. -- http://www.smallsql.de - the 100% pure Java Desktop Database with JDBC "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:d6mav9$22n9$3@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk... > T.J. wrote: > >> Just noticed that Google is no longer omitting common words >> from the search phrase. >> Anyone noticed how long this has been happening? > > Am I right to think that entire phrases (e.g. questions) should be > possibly > to get a match for? So far it has not worked well and it still doesn't. > > Is there still stemming? Will I get similar results for 'man walking > slowly' > and 'men walks slow'? > > Roy > > -- > Roy S. Schestowitz > http://Schestowitz.com |
| |||
| Re: Google no longer omiting common words I see 3.5 billion for a. Maybe you were seeing a preview of their next big update -- Greg http://www.microlev.com/ "Justin Sane" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news >> 4,810,000,000 hits for "and". ROTFL > > http://www.google.com/search?q=a > > 3.7 trillion results > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Justin. > http://www.auriance.com - http://www.auriance.net |