| ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
|  | |  | |  | |
05-31-2005, 01:18 AM
| |||
| |||
| Directory titles important now? It could be that Google is using directory titles more now (for description, titles) as the punters have less influence over them. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@kruse.demon.co.uk seo that watches the river flow... --      |
|
05-31-2005, 01:19 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Directory titles important now? Big Bill wrote: > It could be that Google is using directory titles more now (for > description, titles) as the punters have less influence over them. What do you base this statement on? Is it correlated to Igor's post? I suspect that Google puts emphasis on the name of the domain quite often -- something that is even reinforced in anchor text. Roy -- Roy S. Schestowitz http://Schestowitz.com |
|
05-31-2005, 01:19 AM
| |||
| |||
| Re: Directory titles important now? On Tue, 03 May 2005 02:31:13 +0100, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote: >Big Bill wrote: > >> It could be that Google is using directory titles more now (for >> description, titles) as the punters have less influence over them. > >What do you base this statement on? Is it correlated to Igor's post? I >suspect that Google puts emphasis on the name of the domain quite often -- >something that is even reinforced in anchor text. > >Roy I was referring to the title given to a site in a directory listing. I shoulda said. BB -- www.kruse.co.uk/ seo@kruse.demon.co.uk seo that watches the river flow... -- |
Linear Mode
