Home Newsletter Resources

Go Back   Small Business Forum > General Small Business Forums > General Small Business Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-08-2004, 03:24 PM
BTB BTB is offline
Entry Level
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Question help- any ideas

Any ideas on how I can manage- I am the president and one of six shareholders of a company that grew from 12 to 44 employees. The shareholders include the secretary, two counselors, intake coordinator, business manager and myself. I think that the other shareholders feel the most comfortable with relatively minor decisions like what color the walls should be. I need strategies on how to manage these five individuals with the exception of the business manager having little understanding of how to run a company of 44 employees, income of over 1.2 million and a net profit for 150,000.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-09-2004, 05:11 AM
orion_joel orion_joel is offline
CEO
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 318
Send a message via ICQ to orion_joel Send a message via MSN to orion_joel
What is it that you really need to manage in the business, Is it just the other shareholders and what they do or is there more then that. What is your specific Role. This may be able to help us better help you.
__________________
Joel Brown - Orion Networks
Techie-Central - Forums | SEOPTIMISA
Books | PHP
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2004, 03:45 PM
BTB BTB is offline
Entry Level
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2
more information

I am the president of the corporation but also a fellow shareholder. When it comes to decision making, I have the same vote as the other five. How do I separate out managing the business with managing the five individuals who bring very different experience to the table.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2004, 04:18 PM
wwcap1 wwcap1 is offline
Vice President
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 99
Differentiate

Don't you have by-laws that spell out the authority of each of the officers, as opposed to shareholders? If not make some that delineate each officers function and what they are authorized to do. It sounds like your running your business by committee and that's and that's well... you know it needs to be changed.

Kent Capener
__________________
http://www.capenerconsulting.com
Solutions For Small Business
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-10-2004, 04:58 PM
Peter T Davis's Avatar
Peter T Davis Peter T Davis is offline
CEO
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,240
I agree with Kent. Shareholders generally don't get a vote on day-to-day business decisions.
__________________
Peter T Davis
Frixer, Inc.
Helping people make profitible businesses on the web.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2004, 04:06 AM
keilo keilo is offline
Assistant Vice President
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 45
The Camel, A Horse Designed by Committee.

No business can long be run successfully by committee. It is too time consuming and laborious. Working on consensus decisions all the time rarely delivers optimal performance.

Appoint a CEO (can be one of the 5 share holders). Enshrine CEO authority in clear terms of reference agreed by your share holders.

Are your share holders all members of the board? If so, allocate roles and produce terms of reference for each.

You may well find that the other share holders are also uncomfortable with the current situation. Talk to them. Lay it on the line. Get their opinions. Then act.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-23-2004, 07:04 PM
amoore amoore is offline
Manager
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11
Was in a similar situation that you are in and someone else was right you need a CEO and he needs the authority to run the business. Also the other shareholders have to accept him as the CEO and feel ok with giving him the power to run the business.

The shareholders/board should not be in the day to day activities of running the business. As one of my classes said the board should be the leaders "IE here is how much money we want to make next year" the people running it should be the managers IE "Here is how we make X amount of money next year"

Alan
__________________
Alan Moore
www.1stcalltechnology.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC5
smallbusinessforum.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30